Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A comprehensive model for molecular weight calculations of free‐radical crosslinking copolymerizations was developed using the pseudo‐kinetic rate constants and the method of moments. The moments of copolymer chain distributions are defined in such a way so that the molecular weight averages of crosslinking copolymers can be calculated using the moments. The present model is based on a general crosslinking copolymerization scheme, accounting for chain transfer to small molecules and polymer, bimolecular termination, and crosslinking reactions. The influence of crosslinking reactions on molecular weight development is discussed. The effects of the reactivity of pendant double bonds on the moments development were further demonstrated using model simulations. The simulations results suggest that the higher‐order molecular weight averages are very sensitive to the reactivity of pendant double bonds. It was found that chain transfer to polymer affects the gelation point significantly. The radical fractions must be calculated accounting for chain transfer reactions in addition to propagations in order to properly evaluate pseudo‐kinetic rate constants. The present model was used to predict kinetic behavior and molecular weight development of styrene/m‐divinylbenzene and styrene/ethylene dimethacrylate free‐radical crosslinking copolymerizations in benzene solution at 60°C. It was found that the present model is in excellent agreement with the experimental data published in the literature. Model predictions and experimental data show that the reactivity of pendant double bonds is much lower than that of vinyl and divinyl monomers. The simulation results suggest that the assumption of the same reactivity of functional groups is likely not valid for many free‐radical crosslinking copolymerizations. The present model based on a kinetics approach can be used to predict molecular weight development for vinyl/divinyl free‐radical crosslinking copolymerizations and to estimate kinetic parameters in the pre‐gelation period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: