When considered in the Palatini formalism, the Starobinsky model does not provide us with a mechanism for inflation due to the absence of a propagating scalar degree of freedom. By (non)-minimally coupling scalar fields to the Starobinsky model in the Palatini formalism we can in principle describe the inflationary epoch. In this article, we focus on the minimally coupled quartic and natural inflation models. Both theories are excluded in their simplest realization since they predict values for the inflationary observables that are outside the limits set by the Planck data. However, with the addition of the R 2 term and the use of the Palatini formalism, we show that these models can be rendered viable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2019 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: