Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-flaws are very common in natural rocks. To date, the understanding of the failure process of rocks with cross-flaws is very limited. In this research, we study the influence of the cross-flaws geometry on the rock strength and coalescence modes with rock-like specimens. In this work, three groups of specimens with pre-existing cross-flaws are investigated: two aligned cross-flaws, two step cross-flaws, and two collinear primary flaws. The crack propagation and strength of specimens containing two parallel flaws are also studied to compare the results with those of specimens with cross-flaws. The results demonstrate that the cross-flaw geometry influences the rock bridge coalescence patterns in rock-like specimens. Specimens with two aligned cross-flaws and two step cross-flaws coalesce with tensile cracks in the rock bridge areas, while specimens with two collinear primary flaws coalesce with shear cracks. Specimens containing two cross-flaws may have a higher uniaxial compressive strength than specimens containing two parallel flaws, and the number of specimens with a higher uniaxial compressive strength is influenced by the cross-flaws geometry in the different groups. The cross-flaws geometry influences the strength of the specimens. In this research, specimens in the group containing two aligned cross-flaws have the highest mean uniaxial compressive strength, and specimens in the group with two step cross-flaws have the lowest strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: