Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SETTING: Gitega Fistula Centre (GFC), a dedicated obstetric fistula repair centre providing comprehensive care at the Gitega District Hospital, rural Burundi. OBJECTIVES: To describe 1) the proportion who returned for scheduled 3- and 6-month follow-up visits and 2) outcomes (fistula closure rates and continence status) at discharge from hospital and after 3 and 6 months among patients who underwent fistula repair surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis using programme data from April 2010 to December 2011. RESULTS: A total of 475 women with obstetric fistula underwent surgical repair. At discharge from hospital, 415 (87%) had a closed fistula, of whom 318 (77%) were continent of urine and/or faeces, while 97 (23%) remained incontinent despite closure. Of the 415 patients with closed fistula, only 244 (59%) were followed up at 3 months and 73 (18%) at 6 months (χ(2) for linear trend 576, P < 0.0001). This indicates progressive loss to follow-up, reaching 82% by 6 months. CONCLUSION: Women undergoing obstetric fistula repair surgery at GFC achieve good hospital exit outcomes. Thereafter, substantial and progressive loss to follow-up hinder the ability to judge programme success over time. Steps to address this operational problem are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bishinga et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: