PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 22, 2021The Lancet Neurology104 citationsOpen Access

Apixaban versus no anticoagulation after anticoagulation-associated intracerebral haemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation in the Netherlands (APACHE-AF): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

FSFloris H.B.M. SchreuderKNKoen M. van NieuwenhuizenJHJeannette Hofmeijer

Key Result

Apixaban yielded similar rates of non-fatal stroke or vascular death compared to avoiding anticoagulation in AF patients with recent intracerebral haemorrhage (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.48-2.31; p=0.90).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=101)

Blinding

Open-label

Randomization

1:1

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does apixaban reduce the composite of non-fatal stroke or vascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation and recent anticoagulation-associated intracerebral haemorrhage compared to avoiding anticoagulation?

P
Population
101 patients with atrial fibrillation and recent anticoagulation-associated intracerebral haemorrhage, followed for a median of 1.9 years.
I
Intervention
Oral apixaban (5 mg twice daily or a reduced dose of 2.5 mg twice daily)
C
Comparator
Avoid anticoagulation (oral antiplatelet agents could be prescribed at the discretion of the treating physician; 51% started antiplatelet therapy)
O
Outcome
Composite of non-fatal stroke or vascular death, whichever came first, during a minimum follow-up of 6 monthscomposite

In patients with atrial fibrillation and recent anticoagulation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage, apixaban did not significantly differ from avoiding anticoagulation in preventing non-fatal stroke or vascular death, highlighting the need for larger trials.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 1.05 (95% CI 0.48–2.31)

Absolute Event Rate: 26% vs 24%

p-value: p=0.90

Limitations

  • Small sample size (phase 2 trial not large enough to allow identification of subgroups in whom restarting anticoagulation might be beneficial or hazardous)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation who survive an anticoagulation-associated intracerebral haemorrhage, a decision must be made as to whether restarting or permanently avoiding anticoagulation is the best long-term strategy to prevent recurrent stroke and other vascular events. In APACHE-AF, we aimed to estimate the rates of non-fatal stroke or vascular death in such patients when treated with apixaban compared with when anticoagulation was avoided, to inform the design of a larger trial. METHODS: -VASc score of at least 2 and a score on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 4 or less. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral apixaban (5 mg twice daily or a reduced dose of 2·5 mg twice daily) or to avoid anticoagulation (oral antiplatelet agents could be prescribed at the discretion of the treating physician) by a central computerised randomisation system, stratified by the intention to start or withhold antiplatelet therapy in participants randomised to avoiding anticoagulation, and minimised for age and intracerebral haemorrhage location. The primary outcome was a composite of non-fatal stroke or vascular death, whichever came first, during a minimum follow-up of 6 months, analysed using Cox proportional hazards modelling in the intention-to-treat population. APACHE-AF is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02565693) and the Netherlands Trial Register (NL4395), and the trial is closed to enrolment at all participating sites. FINDINGS: Between Jan 15, 2015, and July 6, 2020, we recruited 101 patients (median age 78 years IQR 73-83; 55 54% were men and 46 46% were women; 100 99% were White and one 1% was Black) a median of 46 days (IQR 21-74) after intracerebral haemorrhage. 50 were assigned to apixaban and 51 to avoid anticoagulation (of whom 26 51% started antiplatelet therapy). None were lost to follow-up. Over a median follow-up of 1·9 years (IQR 1·0-3·1; 222 person-years), non-fatal stroke or vascular death occurred in 13 (26%) participants allocated to apixaban (annual event rate 12·6% 95% CI 6·7-21·5) and in 12 (24%) allocated to avoid anticoagulation (11·9% 95% CI 6·2-20·8; adjusted hazard ratio 1·05 95% CI 0·48-2·31; p=0·90). Serious adverse events that were not outcome events occurred in 29 (58%) of 50 participants assigned to apixaban and 29 (57%) of 51 assigned to avoid anticoagulation. INTERPRETATION: Patients with atrial fibrillation who had an intracerebral haemorrhage while taking anticoagulants have a high subsequent annual risk of non-fatal stroke or vascular death, whether allocated to apixaban or to avoid anticoagulation. Our data underline the need for randomised controlled trials large enough to allow identification of subgroups in whom restarting anticoagulation might be either beneficial or hazardous. FUNDING: Dutch Heart Foundation (grant 2012T077).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schreuder et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation with recent anticoagulation-associated intracerebral haemorrhage (n=101). Apixaban vs. Avoid anticoagulation was evaluated on Composite of non-fatal stroke or vascular death (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.48-2.31, p=0.90). Apixaban yielded similar rates of non-fatal stroke or vascular death compared to avoiding anticoagulation in AF patients with recent intracerebral haemorrhage (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.48-2.31; p=0.90).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa3ce5622af0bded4f42f5ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00298-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper