Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The hysteretic behaviour of a freely vibrating cylinder, near the low-Reynolds-number end of synchronization/lock-in, in the laminar regime is investigated. Computations are carried out using a stabilized finite-element method. The flow remains two-dimensional in this Reynolds number regime. This is verified via comparison of two- and three-dimensional computations. The cylinder is free to undergo crossflow as well as in-line vibrations. The combined effect of mass ratio (1 ≤m* ≤ 100) and blockage (0.25% ≤B≤ 12.5%) is studied in detail. The existence of a critical mass ratio (m*cr= 10.11), below which hysteresis disappears for an unbounded flow situation, is identified. For higher mass ratio the hysteretic behaviour is observed for all blockage. However, the hysteresis loop width is found to vary withB; its variation withm* andBis studied. The concept of critical blockageBcris introduced. ForB≤Bcrthe response of the cylinder is virtually the same as that in an unbounded flow domain. The variation ofBcrwithm* is investigated. Furthermore,Bcris found to vary non-monotonically withm* form* ≤m*crand is almost constant form* ≥ 20. The effect of damping, as well as restricting the cylinder to undergo transverse vibrations only, on the hysteresis behaviour is studied. The transverse-only motion leads to a larger hysteresis loop width compared with the transverse and the in-line motion of the cylinder. An attempt is made to explain this by comparing the results from forced vibrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasanth et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: