There has developed in recent years a growing sense of schism dividing history from criticism in the study of public address. This essay reassesses the relationship between history and criticism with respect to intrinsic and extrinsic analysis, the role of evaluation in rhetorical scholarship, and the nature of critical and historical method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen E. Lucas (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: