This essay discusses selected English translations of the Daode jing by people who do not know Chinese, and criticizes them on three counts: they rely heavily on earlier translations; they fail any basic test of accuracy; and they distort and simplify the philosophy of the original. The paper concludes by considering why publishers continue to market such works, and why readers consume them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul R. Goldin (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: