Upper and lower bounds were obtained previously on matrix elements of the form Wₙₘ=(ψₙ,Wψₘ), where W is a Hermitian operator and ψₙ and ψₘ are the wave functions of the nth and mth states of the system. The bounds are variational but nonstationary; they are expressed in terms of trial wave functions Ψₙₜ and Ψₘₜ containing variational parameters, but the error in the bound is of first order in the errors in the Ψₙₜ and Ψₘₜ. The results have been either subject to rather restrictive conditions (for example, only for certain specific choices for W and only for real wave functions) or have been very conservative. We remove most of these restrictions (W need not be positive or negative definite, the wave functions may be complex, the system may not even be invariant under time reversal) but maintain rigorous bounds of good quality. The method of using Gram-determinant inequalities, which has been employed previously, especially by Weinhold, and which we adopt, leads to variational but nonstationary bounds on Wₙₘ in terms of "simple" upper bounds (which may be poor) on W²ₙₙ. Here again, only for a very few particular choices of W have such simple bounds on W²ₙₙ been given previously (for example, n restricted to be the ground state, and W the operator zᵢ, the coordinate of the ith electron). The main result of this paper is to show that such simple upper bounds can be obtained for a very wide class of operators W in terms of the energy eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian. (They can be improved if given additional experimental information on oscillator strengths, for example). These simple bounds on W²ₙₙ do not involve any trial wave functions. The method of variational but nonstationary bounds is illustrated for diagonal matrix elements of r₁ and r₁²---we, therefore, require simple bounds on r₁² and r₁⁴---for the states 1s² ¹S and 1s2s ³S of the helium atom, with rather good results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blau et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: