Key result
Intra-coronary tacrolimus limits infarct size and preserves LVEF vs saline in a mini-pig AMI model.
Why the study?
Does intra-coronary tacrolimus reduce infarct size and inflammation in a mini-pig model of acute myocardial infarction?
Does intra-coronary tacrolimus reduce infarct size and inflammation in a mini-pig model of acute myocardial infarction?
p-value: p=<0.001
Intra-coronary tacrolimus administration limits infarct size, attenuates inflammation, and preserves LV function in a mini-pig model of acute myocardial infarction.
Hypothesis-generating for tacrolimus post-AMI; human trials required before any clinical consideration.
AIM: This study tested the hypothesis that tacrolimus therapy limited left ventricular (LV) infarct and remodeling by suppressing the inflammatory response, oxidative stress and regulating the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and Akt signaling pathways in an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mini-pig model by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). METHODS: Twelve male mini-pigs were equally randomized into AMI treated by saline (3.0 mL) (AMI(S)), and AMI treated by tacrolimus (0.5 mg) (AMI(T)). Thirty minutes after the procedure, intra-LAD injections were performed just beyond the ligation. RESULTS: Inflammatory biomarkers at transcription or protein levels [matrix metalloproteinase (MMP9), plasminogen activator inhitor-1, tumor necrotic factor (TNF-α), nuclear factor (NF)-κB] and the cellular level (CD40+ cells) were markedly higher in AMI(S) than in AMI(T) animals (all p<0.001). Fibrosis biomarkers at the protein level (α-smooth muscle actin, transforming growth factor-β) and Sirius-red staining were notably higher in AMI(S) than in AMI(T) animals (all p<0.03). Antioxidant biomarkers at protein or transcription levels (heme oxygenase-1, quinone oxidoreductase-1, glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase) were significantly higher in AMI(S) than in AMI(T) animals (all p<0.01). Protein expressions of ERK1, p38 MAPK and Akt were markedly increased in AMI(S) compared to AMI(T) animals (all p<0.001). Significantly aggravated LV infarction and remodeling were noted in AMI(S) compared to AMI(T) animals, whereas LV ejection fraction was markedly decreased in AMI(S) compared to AMI(T) animals (all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-coronary administration of tacrolimus attenuated inflammation and MAPK signaling, limited infarct size, and preserved LV function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2012) studied Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=18). Tacrolimus vs. Saline (3.0 mL) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size (p=<0.001). Intra-coronary administration of tacrolimus significantly attenuated inflammation, limited infarct size, and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction compared to saline in a mini-pig AMI model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: