Key result
Aspirin for colorectal cancer prevention faces clinician barriers regarding dosage and evidence despite perceived safety.
Why the study?
Australian guidelines recommend low-dose aspirin to reduce colorectal cancer risk in adults aged 50-70 years, but clinicians' practices, knowledge, opinions, and implementation barriers and facilitators were unexplored.
What are clinicians' opinions and the barriers and facilitators to implementing guidelines recommending aspirin for colorectal cancer prevention in Australians aged 50-70 years?
What are clinicians' opinions and the barriers and facilitators to implementing guidelines recommending aspirin for colorectal cancer prevention in Australians aged 50-70 years?
Widespread adoption of aspirin for colorectal cancer prevention requires active implementation strategies focused on primary care to overcome clinician uncertainty regarding evidence and dosage.
Clinician uncertainty on aspirin dosing and evidence remains a barrier to CRC prevention; leaves open optimal primary care implementation strategies.
OBJECTIVES: Australian guidelines recommend all adults aged 50-70 years old without existing contraindications consider taking low-dose aspirin (100-300 mg per day) for at least 2.5 years to reduce their risk of developing colorectal cancer. We aimed to explore clinicians' practices, knowledge, opinions, and barriers and facilitators to the implementation of these new guidelines. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with clinicians to whom the new guidelines may be applicable (Familial Cancer Clinic staff (geneticists, oncologists and genetic counsellors), gastroenterologists, pharmacists and general practitioners (GPs)). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) underpinned the development of the interview guide. Coding was inductive and themes were developed through consensus between the authors. Emerging themes were mapped onto the CFIR domains: characteristics of the intervention, outer setting, inner setting, individual characteristics and process. RESULTS: Sixty-four interviews were completed between March and October 2019. Aspirin was viewed as a safe and cheap option for cancer prevention. GPs were considered by all clinicians as the most important health professionals for implementation of the guidelines. Cancer Council Australia, as a trusted organisation, was an important facilitator to guideline adoption. Uncertainty about aspirin dosage and perceived strength of the evidence, precise wording of the recommendation, previous changes to guidelines about aspirin and conflicting findings from trials in older populations were barriers to implementation. CONCLUSION: Widespread adoption of these new guidelines could be an important strategy to reduce the incidence of bowel cancer, but this will require more active implementation strategies focused on primary care and the wider community. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620001003965).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milton et al. (2021) studied Colorectal cancer prevention guidelines implementation (n=64). New guidelines recommending low-dose aspirin for colorectal cancer prevention was evaluated on Clinicians' practices, knowledge, opinions, and barriers and facilitators to the implementation of new guidelines. Among 64 interviewed clinicians, aspirin was viewed as a safe option for colorectal cancer prevention, though uncertainty about dosage, evidence strength, and conflicting trial findings were barriers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: