Magnetic anisotropy in pentagonal bipyramidal complexes of Co(II) ( 1 and 2 ), Fe(III) ( 3 and 4 ), and Ni(II) ( 5 ) with a 2,2′-[2,6-pyridinediylbis(ethylidyne-1-hydrazinyl-2-ylidene)]bis[ N, N, N -trimethyl-2-oxoethanaminium] equatorial ligand and isothiocyanato axial ligands has been investigated by magnetic susceptibility measurements, powder X-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, Mössbauer spectroscopy, ab initio, and ligand-field density functional theory (LFDFT) calculations. The studied complexes display three distinct types of magnetic anisotropy. Co(II) complexes ( 1 and 2 ) show an easy plane anisotropy with large and positive D values and negligible rhombicity. The Ni(II) complex ( 5 ) has uniaxial magnetic anisotropy with a negative D value. Fe(III) complexes ( 3 and 4 ) have small zero-field splitting (ZFS) parameters. Theoretical modeling is used to rationalize the magnetic anisotropy in these systems and to identify the most important excited states that are responsible for the zero-field splitting. These excitations are a consequence of the electronic structure of the central metal ion in ideal pentagonal bipyramidal coordination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darmanović et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: