Effects of nonspecific solvation on chemical bonding, described with a simple self-consistent reaction field model, are rigorously analyzed in terms of electron flow and electronegativity equalization between two molecular fragments A and B. In most (but not all) systems AB, the energy-lowering rise in the dipole moment that accompanies solvation is the result of an enhanced charge transfer between A and B, the enhancement stemming from both the increased electronegativity difference ΔχAB and the decreased bond hardness κAB. In systems, such as H⋅Cl, H⋅CN, and CH3⋅CN, that ensue from interactions between charged closed-shell fragments (H++Cl−, H++CN−, CH+3+CN−, etc.) the energy-stabilizing effect of solvation is a trade-off between the energy lowering due to the enhanced charge-transfer component of bonding and destabilization due to diminished covalent bonding. On the other hand, interactions between electrically neutral fragments (NH3+SO3, etc.) produce systems, such as the zwitterion of sulfamic acid (+H3N⋅SO−3), in which charge-transfer and covalent components of bonding are strengthened in tandem by solvation. The aforementioned phenomena account for the experimentally observed solvation-induced changes in the A–B bonds, namely their lengthening (or even a complete dissociation) in the former systems and shortening in the latter ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciosłowski et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: