This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The combination of inetetamab and vinorelbine has demonstrated survival benefits with an acceptable toxicity profile in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. This multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial further evaluates the efficacy of inetetamab combined with pertuzumab and nab-paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy. Treatment-naïve patients with HER2+ early-stage or locally advanced BC received four cycles of intravenous inetetamab (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg for subsequent doses), intravenous pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, then 420 mg for subsequent doses), and weekly nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m 2 ). The primary endpoint was the total pathological complete response (tpCR) rate, defined as ypT0/is and ypN0, assessed by independent central review. From March 2023 to February 2024, 62 patients were enrolled, with the majority (61/62) completing 4 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. The tpCR rate was 56.5% (95% CI: 43.3%-69.0%). Further analysis showed that patients with estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumors derived greater benefit, with a tpCR rate of 90.9%. The objective response rate was 90.3% (95% CI: 80.1%-96.4%). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (32.3%), decreased white blood cell count (19.4%), infectious pneumonia (3.2%), anemia (3.2%), and diarrhea (3.2%). No death occurred during the neoadjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant treatment with inetetamab, in combination with pertuzumab and nab-paclitaxel, demonstrates good efficacy and tolerability, especially in ER-negative patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: