Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Over the last several decades, many developed countries have increased patient cost-sharing to contain healthcare expenditures. Some influential studies, including the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, suggest that increasing patient cost-sharing reduces unnecessary medical care by mitigating ex-post moral hazard. However, most existing studies in this field focus on short-run effects, in which the health status of the insured and provider behaviors remain unchanged. In this study, we analyze the medium-term impact of the 2003 coinsurance rate increase on inpatient care utilization by using public hospital data in Japan covering a 12-year period. Difference-in-differences and event study analyses robustly showed that the number of inpatients decreased a few years after the 2003 reforms. However, inpatient costs per patient day began to increase after four years, mainly due to increased medical resources. Eventually, despite the initial reduction in the number of inpatients, we found that the effects on total inpatient costs were negligible in the medium run. These findings indicate that many existing studies may overestimate the cost-containment effects of patient cost-sharing in the medium- and long-term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshimura et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: