Key result
Head-mounted motion sensors estimate heart rate within 0.82 bpm of an FDA-cleared sensor.
Why the study?
Can motion-sensitive sensors embedded in a head-mounted wearable device accurately measure heart rate and respiration rate?
Observational (n=12)
No
Can motion-sensitive sensors embedded in a head-mounted wearable device accurately measure heart rate and respiration rate?
Mean Difference: 0.82
Head-mounted wearable devices like Google Glass can accurately measure heart rate and respiration rate using embedded motion sensors and cameras.
Hypothesis-generating for head-worn wearables in vital sign monitoring; larger validation studies needed before clinical consideration.
This work explores the feasibility of using motion-sensitive sensors embedded in Google Glass, a head-mounted wearable device, to robustly measure physiological signals of the wearer. In particular, we develop new methods to use Glass’s accelerometer, gyroscope, and camera to extract pulse and respiratory waves of 12 participants during a controlled experiment. We show it is possible to achieve a mean absolute error of 0.82 beats per minute (STD: 1.98) for heart rate and 0.6 breaths per minute (STD: 1.19) for respiration rate when considering different observation windows and combinations of sensors. Moreover, we show that a head-mounted gyroscope sensor shows improved performance versus more commonly explored sensors such as accelerometers and demonstrate that a head-mounted camera is a novel and promising method to capture the physiological responses of the wearer. These findings included testing across sitting, supine, and standing postures before and after physical exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernandez et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=12). Head-mounted motion-sensitive sensors (Google Glass) vs. FDA-cleared sensor (FlexComp Infiniti) was evaluated on Mean absolute error of heart rate estimation (MAE 0.82 bpm). Head-mounted motion-sensitive sensors achieved a mean absolute error of 0.82 beats per minute for heart rate and 0.6 breaths per minute for respiration rate compared to an FDA-cleared sensor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: