Why the study?
Does bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting improve long-term survival compared to single internal-thoracic-artery grafting in patients undergoing CABG?
Does bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting improve long-term survival compared to single internal-thoracic-artery grafting in patients undergoing CABG?
This editorial discusses the ongoing debate and observational evidence regarding the optimal choice of a second conduit, specifically bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafting, in CABG.
Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), introduced in the 1960s, remains the standard revascularization treatment for complex coronary disease.1 The left internal thoracic artery, with its excellent patency when used as a graft, is the conduit of choice for anastomosis to the left anterior descending coronary artery. However, the selection of the second conduit remains a matter of debate. Most CABG procedures are performed with a left internal-thoracic-artery graft and saphenous-vein grafts, despite guidelines advocating the use of more arterial grafts. In particular, the use of bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting has been associated with better long-term survival than single internal-thoracic-artery grafting in observational . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Head et al. (2019) conducted an editorial in Complex coronary disease. Bilateral internal-thoracic-artery grafting vs. Single internal-thoracic-artery grafting was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: