Key result
Letter critiques AF catheter ablation literature for missing critical clinical endpoints.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urges caution when applying AF ablation cost-effectiveness data; leaves open whether trials with comprehensive endpoints would change conclusions.
To the Editor The publication of not one but two reviews of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in the August 2010 issue of Heart is very welcome.1 2 The English and Welsh guidance from the …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Soljak (2010) studied this question. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation literature is critiqued for missing critical clinical endpoints in this letter to the editor.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: