For a scalar random-effect variance, Browne and Draper (2005) have found that the uniform prior works well. It would be valuable to know more about the vector case, in which a second-stage prior on the random effects variance matrix D is needed. We suggest consideration of an inverse Wishart prior for D where the scale matrix is determined from the first-stage variance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kass et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: