Key result
Antiplatelet resistance remains controversial while gold-standard platelet aggregometry is limited by time and operator dependence.
A simple, rapid, near-patient test for antiplatelet resistance could allow risk stratification and individualization of antiplatelet medication to improve clinical outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ongoing controversy and testing limitations leave antiplatelet resistance unresolved; supports research into rapid standardized assays.
Aspirin and clopidogrel are the most commonly used antiplatelet agents in patients with coronary artery disease. The existence of resistance to these agents has been a controversial issue and new drugs are being developed to overcome this problem. Laboratory tests, which can identify resistance and correlate this with clinical outcome, are being studied in order to identify patients at risk of future thrombotic events. We discuss the evidence for the existence of antiplatelet resistance-both in the laboratory and in the clinical setting. So far, platelet aggregometry has been considered the gold standard test, but is very operator dependant, time consuming, and has shown little correlation with other available tests of antiplatelet resistance. We discuss the available tests of platelet function, their limitations, and evidence for their use. A simple, rapid, near-patient test, which is affordable and useful in the clinical (not just laboratory) setting, could allow risk stratification of patients and individualization of antiplatelet medication to improve outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saraf et al. (2009) conducted a review in coronary artery disease. Antiplatelet agents (aspirin and clopidogrel) was evaluated. Antiplatelet resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel remains controversial, and while platelet aggregometry is the gold standard test, it is operator-dependent and time-consuming.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: