Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It has been well documented that the population of near Earth objects (NEO) poses a terrestrial impact hazard [1-4]. Although current efforts are focused on detecting and cataloging such objects, various schemes for hazard mitigation have been proposed and investigated in some detail [5-15]. Nuclear devices appear attractive for deflecting potentially hazardous NEOs [5], although serious political issues arise concerning the deployment of such devices in space [11]. To overcome such difficulties, a range of nonnuclear options have been proposed. Concepts include focusing solar radiation onto the target asteroid with a large collector and smaller steerable secondary mirror to generate a hot jet of exhaust gas [6,7] or coating the asteroid to alter its albedo, and hence modify the Yarkovsky induced acceleration [8]. Somewhat more conventional approaches center on the use of kinetic energy impacts from either prograde [12,13] or retrograde orbits [9,10], or the use of continuous low thrust to increase the predicted Earth miss distance of the NEO using large solar or nuclear electric vehicles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colin R. McInnes (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: