This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Cuphea carthagenensis is known for its potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, attributed to triterpenes, flavonoids, and tannins. This study aimed to optimise the extraction process for aerial parts of C. carthagenensis using vortex extraction. A Box-Behnken experimental design coupled with response surface methodology was employed to evaluate the effects of three independent variables: sample-to-solvent ratio, velocity, and temperature. The optimised extract underwent phytochemical screening and assessment of its antimicrobial capacity. The highest extraction yields were obtained through maceration (22.84%) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (21.95%). However, the extract by vortex extraction exhibited significantly higher phenolic content (250.17 µgEAG gext−1) and antioxidant capacity. The optimal extraction conditions were identified as a sample-to-solvent ratio of 1:35, 12,000 rpm, and a temperature of 60 °C. The optimised extract was characterised by a predominance of glycosylated flavonoids and demonstrated moderate antibacterial activity, particularly against Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Bacillus subtilis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobucci et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: