Comparative evaluation triangulates journal quality rankings in mathematics education with algorithmic metrics, suggesting multidimensional approaches improve assessment.
Excerpt: In this study, we triangulate the rankings in Table 1 with other measures of journal quality offered through database algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nivens et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: