Key result
Trans-diaphragm RV telemetry placement shortens recovery by ~3 days versus the trans-thoracic approach.
Why the study?
Does a trans-diaphragm approach improve recovery time compared to a trans-thoracic approach for radio-telemetry catheter placement in rats?
Does a trans-diaphragm approach improve recovery time compared to a trans-thoracic approach for radio-telemetry catheter placement in rats?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.4% vs 9.5%
p-value: p=<0.05
The trans-diaphragm approach for right ventricular telemetry in rats is less invasive and allows for faster recovery than the trans-thoracic approach, making it a useful tool for pulmonary hypertension research.
May support refined telemetry in rat PH models; leaves open translation beyond small-animal studies.
Implantable radio-telemetry methodology, allowing for continuous recording of pulmonary haemodynamics, has previously been used to assess effects of therapy on development and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. In the original procedure, rats were subjected to invasive thoracic surgery, which imposes significant stress that may disturb critical aspects of the cardiovascular system and delay recovery. In the present study, we describe and compare the original trans-thoracic approach with a new, simpler trans-diaphragm approach for catheter placement, which avoids the need for surgical invasion of the thorax. Satisfactory overall success rates up to 75% were achieved in both approaches, and right ventricular pressures and heart and respiratory rates normalised within 2 weeks. However, recovery was significantly faster in trans-diaphragm than in trans-thoracic operated animals (6.4+/-0.5 vs 9.5+/-1.1 days, respectively; p<0.05). Stable right ventricular pressures were recorded for more than 4 months, and pressure changes, induced by monocrotaline or pulmonary embolisms, were readily detected. The data demonstrate that right ventricular telemetry is a practicable procedure and a useful tool in pulmonary hypertension research in rats, especially when used in combination with echocardiography. We conclude that the described trans-diaphragm approach should be considered as the method of choice, for it is less invasive and simpler to perform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Handoko et al. (2007) studied Pulmonary hypertension research (animal model) (n=38). Trans-diaphragm approach vs. Trans-thoracic approach was evaluated on Time to full recovery (days to regain pre-surgical body weight) (p=<0.05). The trans-diaphragm approach for right ventricular telemetry catheter placement resulted in significantly faster recovery compared to the trans-thoracic approach (6.4 vs 9.5 days, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: