Management of laryngeal dysplasia in the United Kingdom: a web‐based questionnaire survey of current practice

Figure S1. Importance ratings for factors affecting decision to re-biopsy patients with laryngeal dysplasia. The figures on the y-axis indicate percentages of respondents. The legend form 1 to 4 is the importance rating scale, with one being very important and four being least important. Figure S2. Importance ratings for factors affecting decision to follow up patients with laryngeal dysplasia. The figures on the y-axis indicate percentages of respondents. The legend form 1 to 4 is the importance rating scale, with one being very important and four being least important. Table S1. Clinical information documented by respondents (figures indicate percentage of respondents, rounded to nearest integer; n = 110) Table S2. Initial management of glottic dysplasia of different pathological grades (figures indicate percentage of respondents, rounded to nearest integer; n = 110) Table S3. Management of persistent glottic dysplasia of different pathological grades (figures indicate percentage of respondents, rounded to nearest integer; n = 110) Table S4. Mean (±sd) for importance ratings for items that affect decision making to re-biopsy or follow up patients with laryngeal dysplasia. Low scores indicate greater importance Table S5. Follow up practice for glottic dysplasia of different pathological grades (figures indicate percentage of respondents, rounded to nearest integer; n = 110) Appendix 1. Survey questionnaire Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.