The objective of the present study was to analyze the utility of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidies in a developing country like India. NIPT was offered to 500 pregnant women, after review of data of the ongoing pregnancy. Pre-test counseling included the different methodologies of testing, their benefits, limitations, turnaround time and interpretation of the result and was offered to all. Different vendors were used for the test. The results were explained in a post-test counseling session. The indications of NIPT were positive second (36.6 %) or first (22 %) trimester screen, advanced maternal age with or without positive biochemical screen (24.6 %), ultrasound soft markers (10.8 %), previous history of Down syndrome (4.6 %) and anxious couple (0.1 %). No aneuploidy was detected in 484 samples. In 1 case, no result was available. Fifteen (3 %) cases showed positive results. These included 8 cases of trisomy 21, 3 cases of trisomy 18, 3 cases of monosomy X, and 1 case of triploidy. Confirmatory testing revealed 6 cases (40 %) to be false positive—1 case of trisomy 21, 1 case of trisomy 18, 3 cases of monosomy X, and 1 case of triploidy. Of 484 cases, 230 have delivered healthy neonates, while the rest have yet to deliver. Four cases had to discontinue pregnancy due to complications in later pregnancy but unrelated to the NIPT results. Noninvasive prenatal test qualifies as an ‘advanced’ screening test, and requires invasive diagnostic tests for confirmation of the positive results. The pre- and post-test counseling is essential to appropriately explain the limitations, benefits, and the results to the couple. Recommendations are made for the appropriate deployment of this new technology in developing countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dash et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: