Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accounting for a cooperativity effect in substrate uptake by a microbial culture leads to a Hill type of equation for the specific rate of substrate uptake (Q), that is, Q = Q m S n / ( S n + K sh ) where S is substrate concentration, n is the Hill number and K sh is a constant. For substrates such as N or P, which are conserved in the biomass, the substrate content of the biomass (α) will vary according to the relation ( α − α 0 ) / ( α m − α 0 ) = S n / ( S n + K sh ) where α 0 is the minimum substrate content of the biomass, occurring when S → 0, and α m is the maximum substrate content of the biomass, occurring when the biomass is saturated with substrate. The specific growth rate is given by μ = μ m S n / ( S n + L K sh ) where L is a constant given by α 0/α m. If the substrate is conserved, α 0 = 1/Y 0 and α m = 1/Y m where Y 0 and Y m are the maximum and minimum yields from the substrate, respectively. Experimental tests of these relations applied to N (urea)-limited growth of Chlorella vulgaris in chemostat cultures showed satisfactory agreement between the results and the theory. For N uptake the growth constants were n = 5·5, L = 0·47, K s = (LK sh)1/n = 82 μg N l–1, K s ′ = K sh 1/n = 94 μg N l–1. The apparent departure of L from unity in N-limited growth can be accounted for by starch storage in the biomass. For P (phosphate)-limited growth, n = 1·3, L = 0·15 and K s was about 28 μg P l–1. A discrepancy was found between the K sh value for P uptake obtained from the Q data and that from the α data. This discrepancy may be attributed to phosphate storage in the biomass, which is not allowed for in the model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panikov et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: