Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using molecular dynamics simulations, we compare the solvation of uranyl and strontium nitrates and uranyl chlorides in two room-temperature ionic liquids (ILs): [BMI][PF(6)] based on 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium(+),PF(6)(-) and [EMI][TCA] based on 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium(+),AlCl(4)(-). Both dissociated M(2+),2NO(3)(-) and associated M(NO(3))(2) states of the salts are considered for the two cations, as well as the UO(2)Cl(2) and UO(2)Cl(4)(2)(-) uranyl complexes. In a [BMI][PF(6)] solution, the "naked" UO(2)(2+) and Sr(2+) ions are surrounded by 5.8 and 10.1 F atoms, respectively. The first-shell PF(6)(-) anions rotate markedly during the dynamics and are coordinated, on the average, monodentate to UO(2)(2+) and bidentate to Sr(2+). In an [EMI][TCA] solution, UO(2)(2+) and Sr(2+) coordinate 5.0 and 7.4 Cl atoms of AlCl(4)(-), respectively, which display more restricted motions. Four Cl atoms sit on a least motion pathway of transfer to uranyl, to form the UO(2)Cl(4)(2)(-) complex. The free NO(3)(-) anions and the UO(2)Cl(4)(2)(-) complex are surrounded by imidazolium(+) cations ( approximately 4 and 6-9, respectively). The first shell of the M(NO(3))(2) and UO(2)Cl(2) neutral complexes is mostly completed by the anionic components of the IL, with different contributions depending on the solvent, the M(2+) cation, and its counterions. Insights into energy components of solvation are given for the different systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaumont et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: