Observed monthly precipitation anomalies are standardized across midlatitude land, and ergodicity is invoked to combine the spatially distributed data into probability density functions (pdfs) of precipitation conditioned on the strength of earlier anomalies. The conditional pdfs, though broad and overlapping, are indeed distinct at a high (99.9%) level of confidence. This implies a nonzero degree of predictability for midlatitude precipitation, even at 3-month leads. This behavior is reproduced by an AGCM only when land–atmosphere feedback in the model is enabled.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koster et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: