PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1997Atherosclerosis736 citationsOpen Access

New indices to classify location, severity and progression of calcific lesions in the abdominal aorta: a 25-year follow-up study

View Full Paper
LKLeena I. KauppilaJPJoseph F. PolakLCL. Adrienne Cupples

Key Result

Lumbar aortic calcification scoring revealed that calcification prevalence reached 86% at 25 years, with the mean antero-posterior severity score increasing to 9.3 in men and 10.3 in women.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=617)

Structured PICO

Can composite summary scores from lateral lumbar films reliably assess the severity and progression of lumbar aortic calcification in a population-based cohort?

P
Population
617 Framingham heart study participants followed for 25 years to assess the location, severity, and progression of lumbar aortic calcifications.
E
Exposure
Lateral lumbar films to grade abdominal aortic wall calcification using composite summary scores
O
Outcome
Location, severity, and progression of radiopaque lumbar aortic calcifications and utility of summary scoressurrogate

Lumbar aortic calcification can be reproducibly graded using composite summary scores on lateral lumbar films, providing a simple, low-cost assessment of subclinical vascular disease progression.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess the location, severity and progression of radiopaque lumbar aortic calcifications and to evaluate the utility of summary scores of lumbar calcification in a population-based cohort. Lateral lumbar films, obtained in 617 Framingham heart study participants, were analysed for the presence of abdominal aortic wall calcification in the region corresponding to the first through fourth lumbar vertebrae. The severity of the anterior and posterior aortic calcification were graded individually on a 0-3 scale for each lumbar segment and the results were summarized to develop four different composite scores: (1) affected segments score (range 0-4); (2) anterior and posterior affected score (range 0-8); and (3) antero-posterior severity score (range 0-24). The prevalence of aortic calcification was 37% in men and 27% in women at baseline and 86% in both genders at the follow-up exam 25 years later. During the follow-up interval, the mean of the affected segments score increased from 0.7 in men (0.5 in women) to 2.7 (2.8 in women), the mean of the anterior and posterior affected score from 1.2 (0.8 in women) (P = 0.012 for difference between genders) and the mean of the antero-posterior severity score increased from 1.5 (1.3 in women) to 9.3 (10.3 in women). The antero-posterior severity score offered a slight advantage over other composite scores and had the highest inter-rater intra-class correlations. In summary, lumbar aortic calcification can be graded and composite summary scores are reproducible. This technique appears to provide a simple, low cost assessment of subclinical vascular disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kauppila et al. (1997) conducted a cohort in Lumbar aortic calcification (n=617). Lumbar aortic calcification scoring was evaluated on Progression of lumbar aortic calcification scores. Lumbar aortic calcification scoring revealed that calcification prevalence reached 86% at 25 years, with the mean antero-posterior severity score increasing to 9.3 in men and 10.3 in women.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa44bca7d94f68ea2af597dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9150(97)00106-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper