Key result
TTE-EAdyn discriminates pressure responders during norepinephrine weaning with an AUC of 0.86.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether dynamic elastance derived from echocardiographic measurements of stroke volume variations can predict the success of a one-step decrease of norepinephrine dose.
Does echocardiographic EAdyn predict pressure response during norepinephrine weaning in patients with vasoplegic syndrome?
Observational (n=39)
Single-blind
No
Does echocardiographic EAdyn predict pressure response during norepinephrine weaning in patients with vasoplegic syndrome?
Echocardiographic EAdyn can accurately predict pressure response to norepinephrine weaning in patients with vasoplegic syndrome, offering a non-invasive bedside tool to optimize hemodynamic treatment.
TTE-EAdyn may guide norepinephrine weaning in vasoplegia; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether dynamic elastance EAdyn derived from echocardiographic measurements of stroke volume variations can predict the success of a one-step decrease of norepinephrine dose. In this prospective single-center study, 39 patients with vasoplegic syndrome treated with norepinephrine and for whom the attending physician had decided to decrease norepinephrine dose and monitored by thermodilution were analyzed. EAdyn is the ratio of pulse pressure variation to stroke volume variation and was calculated from echocardiography stroke volume variations and from transpulmonary thermodilution. Pulse pressure variation was obtained from invasive arterial monitoring. Responders were defined by a decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 10% following norepinephrine decrease. The median decrease in norepinephrine was of 0.04 [0.03–0.05] µg kg−1 min−1. Twelve patients (31%) were classified as pressure responders with a median decrease in MAP of 13% [12–15%]. EAdyn was lower in pressure responders (0.40 [0.24–0.57] vs 0.95 [0.77–1.09], p < 0.01). EAdyn was able to discriminate between pressure responders and non-responders with an area under the curve of 0.86 (CI95% [0.71 to1.0], p < 0.05). The optimal cut-off was 0.8. EAdyn calculated from the echocardiographic estimation of the stroke volume variation and the invasive arterial pulse pressure variation can be used to discriminate pressure response to norepinephrine weaning. Agreement between EAdyn calculated from echocardiography and thermodilution was poor. Echocardiographic EAdyn might be used at bedside to optimize hemodynamic treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Vasoplegic syndrome (n=39). Echocardiographic dynamic arterial elastance (TTE-EAdyn) vs. Non-responders was evaluated on Discrimination of pressure responders (decrease in mean arterial pressure > 10%) following norepinephrine decrease (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.0, p=<0.05). Echocardiographic dynamic arterial elastance (TTE-EAdyn) discriminated between pressure responders and non-responders during norepinephrine weaning with an area under the curve of 0.86.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: