Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Performance of a 4-stage biological aerated filter (BAF) system was evaluated with low TCOD/TKN ratio municipal wastewater, focusing on nitrogen removal. To evaluate the BAF system, a modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process was set up and compared to the BAF system. Laboratory experiments were conducted to examine the effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT). Results of the long-term operation of both systems showed that overall NH4 -N removal efficiency of the MLE was drastically reduced (from 98% to 17%) as hydraulic retention time decreased from 6 h to 3 h, whereas that of the BAF was stable with the removal efficiency of 95–96% on average, regardless of HRT applied. The effectiveness of the proposed BAF was observed in denitrification performance. Effluent NOx-N concentrations of the BAF system were lower than MLE (average of 5 mg/L) within 95% confidence level at the HRT of 6 h. At a total chemical oxygen demand (TCOD) to total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) ratio of 3.6, the effluent NO3-N concentration of denitrification column of BAF was 2.7 mg/L. It was concluded that the 4-stage BAF system proposed in this study was excellent in nitrogen removal per-formance by employing four-column functioning as sorption, nitrification, denitrification, and purification, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryu et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: