Penetrating aortic ulcers were associated with a significantly higher risk of aortic rupture (40.0%) compared to classic type A (7.0%) or type B (3.6%) aortic dissection (p=0.0001).
Cohort (n=198)
No
Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the thoracic aorta carry a significantly higher risk of aortic rupture compared to classic type A or B aortic dissections, highlighting the need for accurate recognition and potentially early surgical management.
p-value: p=0.0001
BACKGROUND: Although classic type A and B aortic dissections have been well described, less is known about the natural history of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the thoracic aorta. This study differentiates penetrating ulcer from aortic dissection, determines the clinical features and natural history of these ulcers, and establishes appropriate correlates regarding optimal treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of patient records and imaging studies was conducted with 198 patients with initial diagnoses of aortic dissection (86 type A, 112 type B) at our institution from 1985 to 1997. RESULTS: Of the 198 patients, 15 (7.6%) were found to have a penetrating aortic ulcer on re-review of computed tomographic scans, magnetic resonance images, angiograms, echocardiograms, intraoperative findings, or pathology reports. Two ulcers (13.3%) were located in the ascending aorta; the other 13 (86.7%) were in the descending aorta. In comparison with those with type A or B aortic dissection, patients with penetrating ulcer were older (mean age 76.6 years, p = 0.018); had larger aortic diameters (mean diameter 6.5 cm); had ulcers primarily in the descending aorta (13 of 15 patients, 86.7%); and more often had ulcers associated with a prior diagnosed or managed AAA (6 of 15 patients, 40.0%; p = 0.0001). Risk for aortic rupture was higher among patients with penetrating ulcers (40.0%) than patients with type A (7.0%) or type B (3.6%) aortic dissection (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate recognition and differentiation of penetrating ulcers from classic aortic dissection at initial presentation is critical for optimal treatment of these patients. For penetrating ulcer, the prognosis may be more serious than with classic type A or B aortic dissection. Surgical management is advocated for penetrating ulcers in the ascending aorta and for penetrating ulcers in the descending aorta that exhibit early clinical or radiologic signs of deterioration.
Coady et al. (1998) conducted a cohort in Aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcer (n=198). Penetrating aortic ulcer vs. Type A or B aortic dissection was evaluated on Aortic rupture (p=0.0001). Penetrating aortic ulcers were associated with a significantly higher risk of aortic rupture (40.0%) compared to classic type A (7.0%) or type B (3.6%) aortic dissection (p=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: