The schedule for construction delay analysis should consider resources because it is acknowledged that a schedule without resources is not realistic. However, the conventional resource-constrained scheduling (RCS) technique is not properly operated for the widely accepted delay analysis techniques such as the contemporaneous period analysis (CPA) and the “but-for” method. The “CPM + RCS” method for rescheduling to analyze delay impacts may cause unexpected activity sequence changes and the “RCS-only” method does not reflect the time impact of the duration reduction of an activity and may cause substantial project completion delay by a minor change in the activity duration. This study analyzes the problems that arise when CPA and the “but-for” method are performed on the basis of the conventional RCS technique and shows how the resource-constrained critical path method can be utilized in those delay analyses that have advantages as compared with the RCS technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kyunghwan Kim (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: