Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have studied solid‐state compatibility in the Bi 2 O 3 –TiO 2 –Bi 2 WO 6 ternary system. Based on previously reported data, we prepared different compositions and calcined them in air at 850°C. The crystalline phases and the microstructures were analyzed using X‐ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The results allowed us to determine seven new compatibility triangles: Bi 2 O 3 –Bi 12 TiO 20 –Bi 14 W 2 O 27 , Bi 12 TiO 20 –Bi 4 Ti 3 O 12 –Bi 14 W 2 O 27 , Bi 4 Ti 3 O 12 –Bi 6 Ti 3 WO 18 –Bi 14 W 2 O 27 , Bi 6 Ti 3 WO 18 –Bi 10 Ti 3 W 3 O 30 –Bi 14 W 2 O 27 , Bi 10 Ti 3 W 3 O 30 –Bi 2 WO 6 –Bi 14 W 2 O 27 , Bi 6 Ti 3 WO 18 –Bi 10 Ti 3 W 3 O 30 –Bi 6 Ti 5 WO 22 , and Bi 2 WO 6 –Bi 10 Ti 3 W 3 O 30 –Bi 6 Ti 5 WO 22 . The existence of the Bi 4 WO 9 phase, as reported in the Bi 2 O 3 –WO 3 binary system, could not be confirmed. The Bi 4 Ti 3 W x O 12+3 x ( x ≤0.05) solid solution was detected and, therefore, the Bi 4 Ti 3 O 12 –Bi 2 Ti 4 O 11 –Bi 6 Ti 3 WO 18 compatibility triangle was corrected to include two‐phase fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jardiel et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: