Key result
Amplatz gooseneck snares safely retrieve subclavian central venous catheter fragments occurring in ~3% of cases.
Why the study?
Does the use of an Amplatz gooseneck snare safely remove fragmented central venous catheters in cancer patients?
Observational (n=183)
Does the use of an Amplatz gooseneck snare safely remove fragmented central venous catheters in cancer patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Removal of fragmented central venous catheters using an Amplatz gooseneck snare is a safe and effective procedure.
Prolonged venous access devices are needed in cancer patients for central venous access. Catheter fragmentation leading to catheter malfunction represents a rare problem. Herein we present our experience in the management of fragmented catheters. Between 2001 and 2003, 183 catheters were placed via the subclavian vein, and five cases of fragmented catheters were observed. Fragments were removed by an Amplatz gooseneck snare (Microvena, St. Paul, MN) with angiographic intervention. The diagnosis of the breakage was made by chest radiography. The incidence of catheter breakage was 2.7%. All fragments were removed by the snare, without any complications. Catheter narrowing and breakage owing to its medial positioning in the subclavian vein were the main causes of catheter malfunction. In any case of catheter malfunction, radiologic evaluation of the catheter must be done to rule out its rupture. Removal of the fragments using the Amplatz snare is a safe and easily applied procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yıldızeli et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Cancer requiring central venous access (n=183). Central venous catheter placement via subclavian vein was evaluated on Incidence of catheter breakage. Catheter fragmentation occurred in 2.7% of 183 subclavian central venous catheters, and all 5 fragments were successfully removed using an Amplatz gooseneck snare without complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: