I offer no apology for presenting a simple paper about what is essentially a simple subject: the objectivity of moral judgments. Most of the complications are introduced by those who do not grasp the distinctions I shall be making. I am afraid that they include the majority of moral philosophers at the present time. These complications can be unravelled; but not in a short paper. I have tried to do it in my other writings (see esp. Hare 1981: chs 1, 12 and refs).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. M. Hare (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: