INTRODUCTION: Guided fine-needle aspiration cytology is a popular investigative procedure in diagnosing pulmonary lesions. The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) has already outlined a categorical system for reporting respiratory cytology. Though each category has a known malignancy risk, their inter observer reproducibility have not been well documented. This study was directed towards establishing the reproducibility of this categorical system in diagnosing pulmonary lesions. METHOD: One hundred and one consecutive cytology specimens obtained by CT-guided FNA from lung lesions were independently reviewed by 3 experienced cytopathologists, who allotted each case to 1 of 6 PSC categories. Statistical analysis for percent overall agreement was done using Fleiss' Kappa. RESULT: Percent overall agreement was 71.29% and free marginal kappa was 0.66. On combining categories "suspicious" and "malignant" percent overall agreement was 79.54% and free marginal kappa was 0.74. CONCLUSION: There was substantial agreement among the observers as regards reproducibility of categories which can improve if we combine certain categories, especially "suspicious" and "malignant."
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boler et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: