Key result
Mean dP/dt during isovolumetric contraction correlates strongly with shortening fraction and stress-velocity index.
Why the study?
Does mean dP/dt(ic) correlate with shortening fraction and SVI for assessing ventricular systolic function?
Observational
Does mean dP/dt(ic) correlate with shortening fraction and SVI for assessing ventricular systolic function?
Mean dP/dt(ic) is a reliable echocardiographic index of ventricular systolic function that correlates well with shortening fraction and SVI, and may be particularly useful when unusual anatomy or wall motion compromises other indices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support dP/dt(ic) as systolic index when other measures are limited; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Echocardiographic assessments of ventricular function derived from estimates of the mean dP/dt during isovolumetric contraction (mean dP/dt(ic)) were compared with those obtained from measurements of the shortening fraction and the stress-velocity index (SVI). Mean dP/dt(ic) correlated well with the shortening fraction, r = 0.74, P < 0.0001. Furthermore, 10 out of 11 patients with mean dP/dt(ic) below 800 had a shortening fraction < 0.28, whereas all patients with a mean dP/dt(ic) > 1000 mmHg/sec had a shortening fraction > 0.28. A good correlation also existed between mean dP/dt(ic) and the SVI, r = 0.73, P < 0.0001. Nine out of 11 patients with a mean dP/dt(ic) < 800 mmHg/sec had an SVI > 2 standard deviations below normal, whereas all patients with mean dP/dt(ic) > 1000 mmHg/sec had normal or increased SVI. The correlation between mean dP/dt(ic) and the SVI was strengthened when mean dP/dt(ic) was adjusted for heart rate and preload. Hence, assessments of ventricular function derived from measurements of mean dP/dt(ic) appear to agree well with those provided by the shortening fraction and SVI. Because the determination of mean dP/dt(ic) is not hampered by unusual anatomy or wall motion (conditions which compromise the validity of the shortening fraction and SVI), mean dP/dt(ic) may be a good index of ventricular function in cases where measurements of the shortening fraction and SVI would be unreliable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhodes et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Ventricular systolic function assessment. Mean dP/dt during isovolumetric contraction (mean dP/dt(ic)) vs. Shortening fraction and stress-velocity index (SVI) was evaluated on Correlation with shortening fraction (r = 0.74, p=< 0.0001). Mean dP/dt during isovolumetric contraction correlated well with both the shortening fraction (r = 0.74, P < 0.0001) and the stress-velocity index (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: