Key result
Inappropriate antithrombotics for non-coronary troponin rises occur in ~12% of suspected ACS cases, risking intracranial hemorrhage.
Why the study?
Does inappropriate anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic therapy cause harm in patients with non-coronary troponin elevations?
Cohort (n=223)
No
Does inappropriate anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic therapy cause harm in patients with non-coronary troponin elevations?
Treating isolated high-sensitivity troponin elevations without clinical evidence of ACS with potent antithrombotics can cause severe iatrogenic harm, including intracranial hemorrhage.
Inappropriate antithrombotics for non-coronary troponin rises were associated with intracranial hemorrhage; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before changing practice.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic therapy are well-established treatments in acute coronary syndromes. Highly sensitive assays have diminished the positive predictive value of troponin in acute coronary syndromes and increased the importance of the clinical assessment in interpreting positive results. This cohort study sought to investigate over-treatment of non-coronary troponin rises and associated adverse outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed 223 consecutive patients presenting to Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, with suspected acute coronary syndromes over a six-week period. Of these, 27 (12%) met our 'inappropriate therapy' criteria. This group had a low ischaemic risk (HEART score: 4.2 ± 1.4) (GRACE score: 117 ± 30.8) but an intermediate-high bleeding risk (CRUSADE score: 34 ± 14.5). Approximately half of the patients (14/27, 52%) reported chest pain, with only 4/27 (15%) having ischaemic ECG changes. There were three intracranial haemorrhages, each after the patient had received a single dose of aspirin, ticagrelor and fondaparinux. CONCLUSION: The combination of injudicious high-sensitivity troponin testing with potent anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic therapy was associated with possible over-treatment of patients and associated harm. Emphasis on interpretation of troponin in the context of clinical presentation and improved awareness of type 2 myocardial infarction are essential to limit iatrogenic pharmacological harm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrow et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Suspected acute coronary syndromes (n=223). Inappropriate anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic therapy was evaluated on Over-treatment of non-coronary troponin rises and associated adverse outcomes. Among 223 patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes, 27 (12%) received inappropriate anti-thrombotic therapy for non-coronary troponin rises, resulting in 3 intracranial haemorrhages.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: