Key result
Focused cardiac ultrasound by emergency physicians detects regional wall motion abnormalities with ~92% specificity.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the accuracy of emergency physicians in detecting regional wall motion abnormalities using focused cardiac ultrasound in patients suspected of having non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Does focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) performed by emergency physicians accurately detect regional wall motion abnormalities compared to cardiologist review in patients with chest pain suspected of NSTEMI?
Observational (n=89)
Single-blind
Does focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) performed by emergency physicians accurately detect regional wall motion abnormalities compared to cardiologist review in patients with chest pain suspected of NSTEMI?
Emergency physicians with brief, focused training can accurately detect regional wall motion abnormalities using bedside echocardiography in patients with suspected NSTEMI.
Supports emergency physician FOCUS for RWMA detection; leaves open prospective validation before NSTEMI triage use.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) in the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) using focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) in patients suspected of non-having ST-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with chest pain. Three EPs underwent didactics and hands-on-training, of 3 hours each, by an experienced cardiologist, on detecting RWMAs using 2-dimensional echocardiography. They performed a FOCUS examination to evaluate for RWMAs and recorded the echo images. Our reference standard for the detection of RWMAs was accepted as a blinded cardiologist review of the prerecorded video clips. We calculated the corrected sample size and inter-rater agreement between the EPs (82 and 0.83, respectively). The analysis of the study was performed on 89 patients. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients with chest pain were screened. Emergency physicians demonstrated the detection of RWMAs with good sensitivity and even excellent specificity: 76.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.4%- 91.0%) and 92.1% (95% CI, 82.4%-97.4%), respectively. The accuracy of FOCUS was 87.6% (95% CI, 79.0%-93.7%). The area under the curve from a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, which evaluated the EPs' rate of detecting the presence or absence of RWMAs, was 0.845 (95% CI, 0.753-0.913). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest that EPs with training in bedside echocardiography can accurately rule in patients with RWMAs in suspected non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sağlam et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Chest pain without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=89). Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) by emergency physicians vs. Blinded cardiologist review of echocardiography was evaluated on Detection of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) (AUC 0.845, 95% CI 0.753-0.913). Emergency physicians using focused cardiac ultrasound detected regional wall motion abnormalities with 76.9% sensitivity, 92.1% specificity, and an AUC of 0.845.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: