Key result
Salter innominate osteotomy shows greater acetabular anteversion without retroversion compared to contralateral control hips.
Why the study?
Salter's innominate osteotomy in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip may retrovert the acetabulum, potentially predisposing patients to pain, osteoarthritis, impingement, or further surgery.
Does Salter innominate osteotomy lead to acetabular retroversion in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip?
Cohort (n=92)
No
Does Salter innominate osteotomy lead to acetabular retroversion in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip?
The Salter innominate osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip does not cause acetabular retroversion, but instead results in greater anteversion compared to the contralateral hip.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alleviates retroversion concerns after Salter osteotomy in DDH; leaves open long-term effects of increased anteversion.
In children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), Salter's innominate osteotomy aims to surgically manipulate the acetabulum to increase anterior coverage and aid joint support. Consequently, this procedure may retrovert the acetabulum, predisposing patients to pain, osteoarthritis, impingement, or further surgical intervention. In this study, we aim to address whether the innominate osteotomy leads to acetabular retroversion postoperatively or at follow-up. Ninety-two patients were identified from our institutions DDH database between 2009 and 2016, who underwent a unilateral innominate osteotomy for DDH, performed by expert surgeons in a leading paediatric hospital. A novel technique was utilized to measure acetabular version on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, where acetabular version was compared between the pathological and contralateral control hips. Measurement of acetabular version in postoperative and control hips demonstrated no incidence of acetabular retroversion. A significant difference was observed when comparing the acetabular version of control versus post-operative hips (P < 0.001), where hips postinnominate osteotomy had a larger degree of acetabular anteversion compared to the control hip. Furthermore, on follow-up radiographic imaging, there was no evidence of acetabular retroversion when using previously defined markers. This study confirms that the Salter innominate osteotomy does not lead to acetabular retroversion both immediately post-operatively and throughout follow-up. In fact, it demonstrates that the acetabula are more anteverted than the contralateral control hip, which has not been previously documented. Additionally, this study demonstrates a novel method of measuring acetabular retroversion using CT technology that adjusts for pelvic tilt, which is repeatable among individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Airey et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) (n=92). Salter innominate osteotomy vs. contralateral control hip was evaluated on acetabular version (p=<0.001). Salter innominate osteotomy did not lead to acetabular retroversion, but resulted in significantly greater acetabular anteversion compared to the contralateral control hip (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: