Key result
Cognitive training cuts task-switching errors by ~44% vs control in middle-aged industry workers.
Why the study?
Does trainer-guided cognitive training improve executive functioning in middle-aged industry workers with repetitive work?
RCT (n=57)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does trainer-guided cognitive training improve executive functioning in middle-aged industry workers with repetitive work?
Absolute Event Rate: 11.5% vs 13.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Trainer-guided cognitive training sustainably improves behavioral and electrophysiological markers of executive functioning in middle-aged workers with repetitive jobs.
Supports cognitive training integration in repetitive-work settings; extends RCT evidence to middle-aged industry workers.
Recently, we reported results of a cross-sectional study investigating executive functions in dependence of aging and type of work. That study showed deficits in performance and electrophysiological activity in middle-aged workers with long-term repetitive and unchallenging work. Based on these findings, we conducted a longitudinal study that aimed at ameliorating these cognitive deficits by means of a trainer-guided cognitive training (CT) in 57 further middle-aged workers with repetitive type of work from the same factory. This study was designed as a randomized controlled trail with pre- (t1), post- (t2), and a 3-month follow-up (t3) measure. The waiting control group was trained between t2 and t3. The training lasted 3 months (20 sessions) and was evaluated with the same task switching paradigm used in the previous cross-sectional study. The CT improved performance in accuracy at the behavioral level and affected the electrophysiological correlates of retrieval of stimulus-response sets (P2), response selection (N2), and error detection (Ne), thus unveiling the neuronal background of the behavioral effects. The same training effects were observed in the waiting control group after CT at t3. Moreover, at t3, most of the behavioral and electrophysiological training-induced changes were found stable. Hence, CT appears to be an important intervention for compensating cognitive deficits in executive functions in middle-aged employees with cognitively unchallenging work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gajewski et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Cognitive deficits associated with repetitive work (n=57). Cognitive training vs. Waiting control group was evaluated on Error rates in a memory-based task switching paradigm (p=<0.001). Cognitive training significantly reduced error rates in a task switching paradigm from 20.7% to 11.5% compared to a waiting control group in middle-aged industry workers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: