Site‐specific N management based on an in‐season assessment of crop N status may offer producers increased grain yield, profitability, and spring N fertilizer use efficiency (SNUE). The goal of this study was to determine the distinct contributions of (i) in‐season N rate optimization and (ii) site‐specific N management. Our objective was to compare site‐specific and field‐specific N management with typical growers' practices to determine if site‐specific N management (i) increased soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield, (ii) reduced N inputs, (iii) increased SNUE, and (iv) reduced within‐field grain yield variability. Research was conducted at eight sites in 2000, 2001, and 2002. A randomized complete block design with two or five N management systems was used at two and six sites, respectively. Site‐specific management did not improve grain yield compared with field‐specific management when based on the same in‐season estimation of optimum N rates. At sites where site‐specific or field‐specific systems were compared with typical growers' practices, grain yield benefits of in‐season N optimization (up to 2267 kg ha−1) were apparent. For grain yield, in‐season optimization of N rate was more important than site‐specific management. A large reduction in N inputs (up to 48.6%) was also attributed to in‐season N rate optimization. After incorporating in‐season optimization, a further reduction in N inputs (up to 19.6%) was possible through site‐specific application. Site‐specific N application maximized SNUE compared with either field‐specific or typical growers' practices at all sites and reduced within‐field grain yield variance at four sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flowers et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: