Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ovariectomized female Anolis carolinensis were treated for 14 days with one of the following regimens: (1) estradiol (1 μg/0.05 ml saline/day), (2) progesterone (10 μg/0.05 ml saline/day), or saline (0.05 ml/day). Oviducts then were removed surgically and placed in a bath containing Munsick's solution, to which was added either arginine vasotocin (30 ng/ml) or saline. Although saline produced no effects, AVT‐treated oviducts exhibited rhythmic contractions regardless of pretreatment regimen. Five parameters of the contractions measured were: (1) duration, (2) amplitude, (3) Strength (duration × amplitude), (4) frequency, and (5) rest. Each parameter then was analyzed using a 2 × 3 × 8 mixed, repeated measure design and analysis. Pretreatment with estradiol and progesterone significantly affected contraction strength, amplitude, and duration. Progesterone pretreatment produced oviductal contractions significantly stronger than saline pretreatment (p < 0. 001), whereas estradiol pretreatment produced significantly weaker contractions that saline pretreatment (p < 0.001). These findings are in contrast to those previously recorded for mammals and other reptiles in which estrogens support and progesterone inhibits uterine contractions. These data may suggest a unique adaptation of hormonal control of oviductal contraction in A. carolinensis to the alteration of oviposition during this lizard's reproductive cycle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guillette et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: