Key result
Cardiogenic shock linked to ~55% larger CK-MB estimated infarct size versus no shock.
Why the study?
Is estimated infarct size associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=317)
Is estimated infarct size associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
While cardiogenic shock is associated with larger median infarct size, substantial overlap exists, and patients with small infarcts can also die from shock, especially with severe multi-vessel disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Substantial overlap cautions against infarct size alone for shock risk stratification in AMI; leaves open contributions of multivessel disease and fibrosis.
The relationship between estimated infarct size and cardiogenic shock was investigated in 317 consecutively admitted patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Infarct size was estimated in vivo by serum CK-MB in all patients, and at heart autopsy by histological and histochemical techniques in 23 patients who died in hospital. Although patients with cardiogenic shock (n = 31) had a larger median serum CK-MB estimated infarct size than those without cardiogenic shock (1035 U/l v. 669 U/l, P less than 0.05) there was a substantial overlap in infarct size between the two groups. Heart autopsy confirmed this finding and demonstrated that patients with small subendocardial infarcts also died from shock, especially those with severe 2 or 3 vessel disease and/or infarction fibrosis. Those with cardiogenic shock who survived and those who died from shock had a similar median infarct size, and patients who died from other cardiac causes had the same median infarct size as those who died from shock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grande et al. (1983) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=317). Cardiogenic shock vs. Without cardiogenic shock was evaluated on Median serum CK-MB estimated infarct size (p=<0.05). Cardiogenic shock was associated with a larger median serum CK-MB estimated infarct size compared to no shock (1035 U/l vs 669 U/l, P<0.05), despite substantial overlap between groups.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: