PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology150 citations

Real-Time Assessment of Myocardial Contractility Using Shear Wave Imaging

View Full Paper
MPMathieu PernotMCMathieu CouadePMPhilippe Matéo

Key Result

Myocardial stiffness measured by shear wave imaging correlated strongly with isovolumic systolic pressure (r2 = [0.94; 0.98], p < 0.0001), providing a noninvasive index of myocardial contractility.

Key Points

  • To assess whether ultrafast shear wave imaging can quantify myocardial stiffness across the cardiac cycle in real time and evaluate myocardial contractility.
  • Assessed Langendorff-perfused isolated rat hearts (n = 6) using an ultrasonic probe coupled to an ultrafast scanner operating at 12,000 frames per second.
  • Calculated myocardial stiffness from shear wave velocity every 7.5 ms over single cardiac cycles at baseline and during exposure to escalating doses of isoproterenol (10⁻⁹, 10⁻⁸, and 10⁻⁷ mol/l for 5 minutes each).
  • Average myocardial stiffness varied dynamically across the cycle, measuring 8.6 ± 0.7 kPa in systole compared with 1.7 ± 0.8 kPa in diastole.
  • Isoproterenol infusion increased systolic myocardial stiffness up to 23.4 ± 3.4 kPa, showing a strong correlation with isovolumic systolic pressure (r² = 0.94 to 0.98, p < 0.0001).

PICO

P
Population
6 Langendorff perfused isolated rat hearts undergoing shear wave imaging to assess myocardial stiffness.
I
Intervention / Comparator
Shear wave imaging (SWI) vs Isovolumic systolic pressure at rest and during isoproterenol administration
O
Primary Outcome
Correlation between myocardial stiffness and isovolumic systolic pressure — r2 = [0.94; 0.98], p=< 0.0001

Main Result

Effect estimate: r2 = [0.94; 0.98]

p-value: p=< 0.0001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess whether myocardial stiffness could be measured by shear wave imaging (SWI) and whether myocardial stiffness accurately quantified myocardial function. BACKGROUND: SWI is a novel ultrasound-based technique for quantitative, local, and noninvasive mapping of soft tissue elastic properties. METHODS: SWI was performed in Langendorff perfused isolated rat hearts (n = 6). Shear wave was generated and imaged in the left ventricular myocardium using a conventional ultrasonic probe connected to an ultrafast scanner (12,000 frames/s). The local myocardial stiffness was derived from shear wave velocity every 7.5 ms during 1 single cardiac cycle. RESULTS: The average myocardial stiffness was 8.6 ± 0.7 kPa in systole and 1.7 ± 0.8 kPa in diastole. Myocardial stiffness was compared with isovolumic systolic pressure at rest and during administration of isoproterenol (10(-9), 10(-8), and 10(-7) mol/l, 5 min each). Systolic myocardial stiffness increased strongly up to 23.4 ± 3.4 kPa. Myocardial stiffness correlated strongly with isovolumic systolic pressure (r(2) = 0.94; 0.98, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial stiffness can be measured in real time over the cardiac cycle using SWI, which allows quantification of stiffness variation between systole and diastole. Systolic myocardial stiffness provides a noninvasive index of myocardial contractility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pernot et al. (2011) studied Myocardial contractility assessment (n=6). Shear wave imaging (SWI) vs. Isovolumic systolic pressure at rest and during isoproterenol administration was evaluated on Correlation between myocardial stiffness and isovolumic systolic pressure (r2 = [0.94; 0.98], p=< 0.0001). Myocardial stiffness measured by shear wave imaging correlated strongly with isovolumic systolic pressure (r2 = [0.94; 0.98], p < 0.0001), providing a noninvasive index of myocardial contractility.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa4c499f77744a392ce6028https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.042
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper