Key result
Heart rate during seizures may predict VNS efficacy in refractory epilepsy.
Why the study?
Does ictal heart rate predict the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy?
Does ictal heart rate predict the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy?
The paper proposes a hypothesis that ictal heart rate changes could serve as a predictor for the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in refractory epilepsy.
Ictal heart rate should not yet guide VNS selection in refractory epilepsy; leaves open its predictive value pending prospective validation.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) shows long-term efficiency worldwide in most pharmacoresistant patients with epilepsy; however, there are still a small number of patients who are non-responders to VNS therapy. It has been shown that VNS treatment outcomes for drug-resistant epilepsy may be predicted by preoperative heart-rate variability measurements and that patients with epilepsy with ictal tachycardia (IT) during seizures have good responses to VNS. However, few studies have reported the efficacy of VNS in patients with epilepsy with ictal bradycardia (IB) or normal heart rate (HR), and none have explored the possible mechanisms of VNS efficacy based on different HR types. HR during seizures varies, and we presume that different HRs during seizures may impact the effects of VNS. It has been shown that blood pressure in the human body needs to be maintained through the arterial baroreflex (ABR). VNS efficacy in patients with epilepsy with IT, IB, and normal HR during seizures may be related to ABR. Mechanical signals generated by VNS are similar to the autonomic nerve pathways and, thus, we propose the hypothesis that different HRs during seizures can predict VNS efficacy in patients. If VNS is highly efficient in patients with IT during seizures, VNS in patients with a normal HR during seizures may be less efficient, and may even be inefficient in patients with IB during seizures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2017) studied Refractory epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was evaluated. The authors propose the hypothesis that different heart rates during seizures (tachycardia, bradycardia, or normal) can predict the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: