Key result
Proposed OSAFED syndrome groups OSA, AF, and ED to highlight their shared cardiovascular risk.
The proposed OSAFED syndrome highlights the frequent coexistence of obstructive sleep apnoea, atrial fibrillation, and erectile dysfunction, emphasizing the need for comprehensive screening to reduce overall cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports concurrent screening for OSA, AF, and ED; hypothesis-generating for OSAFED and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Obstructive sleep apnoea, atrial fibrillation and erectile dysfunction (OSAFED) syndrome is a new clinical entity recently introduced into clinical practice. The acronym consists of the first letters of the three clinical entities that comprise the disease, namely obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), atrial fibrillation (AF) and erectile dysfunction (ED). As with many other clinical syndromes, OSAFED syndrome groups several clinical entities, which seemingly concern various organs and have different symptoms, but are closely associated by sharing risk factors and phenotype, and effecting cardiovascular risk in the same manner. OSA, AF and ED are also highly prevalent in the general population and tend to coexist. OSAFED syndrome was named as such to show how important diagnosis is of all these components in specific groups of patient. It is crucial for clinicians to improve the diagnosis and early treatment of all – OSA, AF and ED – and the incorporation of all these factors into one syndrome might help to facilitate this process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szymański et al. (2015) conducted a review in OSAFED syndrome (Obstructive sleep apnoea, atrial fibrillation, erectile dysfunction). OSAFED syndrome was evaluated. The OSAFED syndrome is a proposed clinical entity grouping obstructive sleep apnoea, atrial fibrillation, and erectile dysfunction, which share common risk factors and increase cardiovascular risk.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: