Key result
UACR ≥16 mg/g is linked to ~155% higher cardiovascular mortality risk versus lower levels.
Why the study?
Traditional cutoff values of UACR for predicting mortality have recently been challenged, prompting investigation into optimal thresholds for predicting long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in the general population.
Does a lower UACR cutoff of 16 mg/g better predict long-term cardiovascular mortality compared to the traditional 30 mg/g cutoff in the general adult population?
Cohort (n=25,302)
Yes
Does a lower UACR cutoff of 16 mg/g better predict long-term cardiovascular mortality compared to the traditional 30 mg/g cutoff in the general adult population?
A lower UACR cutoff of 16 mg/g, compared to the traditional 30 mg/g, is more sensitive for identifying individuals in the general population at high risk for long-term cardiovascular mortality.
A UACR threshold of 16 mg/g may improve sensitivity for cardiovascular mortality risk; leaves open whether adoption alters outcomes or practice.
Background Traditional cutoff values of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) for predicting mortality have recently been challenged. In this study, we investigated the optimal threshold of UACR for predicting long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in the general population.Methods Data for 25,302 adults were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005–2014), with mortality status obtained by data matching with death certificates in the National Death Index until December 31, 2015. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of UACR for cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. A Cox regression model was established to examine the association between UACR and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. X-tile was used to estimate the optimal cutoff of UACR.Results The UACR had acceptable predictive value for both cardiovascular (area under the ROC curve [AUC]=0.769, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.711–0.828) and noncardiovascular (AUC=0.722, 95% CI: 0.681–0.764) mortality. Excellent linearity was observed between log-transformed UACR and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. The optimal cutoff values were 16 and 30 mg/g for predicting long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality for the high-risk group were 2.55 (95% CI: 2.03–3.22, P<0.001) and 1.94 (95% CI: 1.72–2.18, P<0.001), respectively.Conclusions Compared to the traditional cutoff value (30 mg/g), a UACR cutoff of 16 mg/g may be more sensitive for identifying patients at high risk for cardiovascular mortality in the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in General population (n=25,302). Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥ 16 mg/g vs. UACR < 16 mg/g was evaluated on Cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.55, 95% CI 2.03-3.22, p=<0.001). A UACR cutoff of ≥ 16 mg/g was associated with a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.55) compared to lower levels in the general population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: